OKO Digital

The ad optimisation people

  • Home
  • Publisher Solutions
    • Website Monetization
    • Header Bidding
    • AdX – Google Ad Exchange
    • App Ad Monetization
    • WordPress Monetization
  • About us
    • OKO & the OKO team
    • Careers
  • Blog
    • Latest blog posts
    • Ad Blocking
    • Ad Exchange (AdX)
    • Ad Optimisation
    • Ad Performance & Page Speed
    • Ad Publishing Landscape
    • AdSense
    • DoubleClick For Publishers (DFP)
    • Exchange Bidding
    • Google Ad Manager
    • Google Certified Publishing Partners
    • Header Bidding
    • Privacy & GDPR
    • Program Policy
    • Open Bidding
    • Traffic
  • Contact

Ad Optimisation . 30th November 2016

When does a $2 CPM beat a $4 CPM?

Publishers are used to dealing in CPMs. They’re a convenient way to compare rates and an easy metric to work with.  However, they are only useful when making true like for like comparisons – something that is easy to exploit.

We love transparency here at OKO. We know that our approach works and encourage publishers to uncover the true value of every ad they run – even providing the tools to make that easier. Not everyone takes this approach and we often see CPMs used a tools to deceive rather than inform publishers.   That often goes something like this:

Shady ad guy: Hey publisher, awesome website you have there. Do you know that my network  “Mega Awesome Ads” can make you loads more money? What CPMs are you getting?

Publisher : I average about $2 CPM I guess

Shady ad guy: Two dollars?? Ha, that’s pathetic. Mega Awesome Ads  will pay you four! You can’t lose can you? Let me help you switch your tags today.

(some time later)

Publisher : Hello? Hello? I’m trying to find out why my earnings haven’t doubled. Anyone there?

How could this go wrong?

The problem is fill rate. Comparing your average impression CPM against a source that isn’t filling at 100% is folly. If a source is promising to double your CPMs and match your current fill rate without any other down-side then jump at it.  If however they are promising a higher CPM for a proportion of those impressions then you need to look at the numbers a bit closer.

You are meant to think “I might as well get paid more for SOME impressions”, but that is how the ruse works: You are already getting paid more for SOME impressions and you might get paid less for them if you switch. To understand that better, let’s look at some real impression CPMs.

What makes an average CPM?

It’s an obvious point, but all advertisers are not paying the average. To get your average impression CPM there are advertisers paying more and less than that amount and you might be surprised by how much the amounts vary.

AdSense provides the revenue profile report to give you some insight into how much variance there is.  It isn’t the most beautiful report, but let’s take a look at results for a publisher averaging just under our mythical $2 impression CPM figure:

CPM

This publisher is averaging $1.82, but has ad requests earning CPMs of up to $19.29. If you zoom in on the image, you will see that 45% of ad requests achieve an average CPM of over $3.81. A network offering $4 CPM might seem attractive, but it needs to fill at a high rate to compete.

How do you know if it is a good deal?

The best way is to test. Run any new demand partner of a proportion of impressions and compare the revenue per request. I’ve written before on how to do this accurately.

If you work with OKO and use OKO Lens, this can be done easily within your dashboard. If not then it is a little time-consuming, but relatively straightforward using an ad-server like DFP.   If you don’t use an ad server and don’t use OKO Lens, then your best bet is to closely monitor the revenue you are receiving for each pageview and try to adjust for changes in traffic patterns.  If you are limited to that approach and trying to assess different demand sources, that might be an indication that it is time to add an ad server  into your mix.

Ad Optimisation . Analysis

About Abbey Colville

SEARCH

TOPICS

  • Ad Blocking
  • Ad Exchange (AdX)
  • Ad Optimisation
  • Ad Performance & Page Speed
  • Ad Publishing Landscape
  • AdSense
  • DoubleClick For Publishers (DFP)
  • Exchange Bidding
  • Google Ad Manager
  • Google Certified Publishing Partners
  • Header Bidding
  • Open Bidding
  • Privacy & GDPR
  • Program Policy
  • Traffic

Could the ads on your site be earning more?

Find out how OKO help publishers earn more from their ads.

LEARN MORE
Insticator

OKO Digital, The Cake Shed, Manor Farm, Manor Road, Hayling Island, Hampshire, PO11 0QW

Google Certified Publisher Partner Logo

OKO is a registered trademark and trading style of OKO Digital Limited. Registered in England company number 03867231. © OKO Digital Limited 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimise our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}